jayjg wrote:
I just called you bluff, that's all. You were hoping we would all just agree the discussion is about a new policy, which is the way you (and a few others) are trying to frame this. I reject your framing.
Bullshit. You're playing games over wording. You are correct in that there isn't a specific policy proposal, but there doesn't have to be - it is quite clear that this particular concept is being pushed and supported as if it were policy.