On 5/30/07, Blu Aardvark <jeffrey.latham(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Joe Szilagyi wrote:
Why not just list them at BADSITES as a "do
not link list"?
That kinda defeats the purpose.
Yeah, but that was my point. :) As it is now, anything from
MSNBC.com to
CNN.com to Wikipedia Review to Making Light to ED to
whitehouse.gov could
theoretically be an attack site. I don't think it's appropriate for any one
person to make the decision. Anyone can put forth a site as one, but if
people don't support it...
Regards,
Joe
http://www.joeszilagyi.com