On 5/29/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/29/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The problem also has nothing to do with admin
tools, so using an RFA
to push the alleged solution is utterly inappropriate.
Well, this is a good point. And as it happens, all three of the
incidents that set everyone on their ears were perpetrated by ordinary
editors.
This notion that admins must agree with everyone and
know policy like the
back
of their hand is bullshit of the highest order.
And yet more good points. What a personal act of sabotage against one
potential administrator, though. I don't think it was about the attack
sites at all, simply an agenda to puddle vitriole--kinda like a personal
attack site on Wikipedia, in a way. Maybe *this* attack site should have
been banned from the RfA.
And don't post links to Wikipedia editor outings on this list, please, or
request it here. What's the purpose?
KP