On 5/27/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Andrew Gray wrote:
On 27/05/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
That wouldn't really solve the problem at all - it's quite possible to have a stable-but-crap article. "Stable" only really means "pretty likely it doesn't say Joe is Gay anywhere"...
If you apply that limitation to stable versions you are right. Stable versioning, however, should be developed to the point where it can do a lot more.
Mmmm.... then we're really talking reviewed versions, or finalised versions, or revision rating structures, or something like that.
Yes, whatever we choose to call it.
[[Silver bullet]]s, maybe?