On 5/14/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Refusing to discuss something once it has been "settled" leads to stagnation. All policies should be open to discussion at all times.
This matter could be in a list of specific situations where GFDL is presumed. Thus a possible wording in this situation might be "A self-portrait of his own self uploaded by a Wikipedian is presumed to have been done in accordance with GFDL." There is no need to refer to fair use at all.
Claiming stuff is under a licence it is not is lying. It is also unlawful.
GFDL presumed is legit on en.wikipedia for images uploaded between 18:23, 19 September 2004 and 20:00, 17 May 2005 (ok technically it isn't between 03:10, 21 September 2004 and 20:22, 21 September 2004 but that isn't something I'm going to worry about yet). I suppose the template should be altered to reflect this but eh wording would need some work.