On 12/05/07, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
To sum up: We need independent and reliable sources on a subject so that information is -verified- and -neutral-, and so that we need not use -original research- to interpret that ourselves. We're -not- an indiscriminate collection information, and we've generally demonstrated -consensus- to delete articles which do not meet these criteria.
Actually, really nothing. If you like the first sentence, I think it would stand on its own.
I'd say "verifiable" instead, as that's the verb of "verifiability" - which is subtly different, but important. Otherwise, excellent. Now how to get everyone else to think it's a good idea ...
- d.