On 5/2/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 5/2/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 5/2/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Anthony wrote:
I'm surprised there isn't already a CSD for "blatantly illegal material".
Fine, add one. We can change policies. Of course, if you tried to add one, it won't work, because you won't gain consensus for it, and for very good reasons.
Who in the world would oppose letting admins delete illegal stuff?
People who didn't trust admins' US legal acumen?
An admin who incorrectly considers something "blatantly illegal" when it actually is not can always be deadminned later.
Yes, and during this entire crisis there were over a dozen active admins in the IRC channel double checking, sharing info, asking for advice, reacting to the onslaught and watching each others' backs.
-Andrew (User:Fuzheado)