On 31/03/07, Anthony <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
In that sense, sourcing requirements *will* help, and
they *will*
increase the number of eyeballs on articles, because a sourced
statement is faster and easier to check than an unsourced one. A rule
alone might not suddenly increase the number of eyeballs, but a rule
that's enforced would certainly make the eyeballs more effective.
We already have sourcing requirements.
The stupidest thing about this thread is people proclaiming the need
for rules we already have, that aren't being followed. Just what makes
you think a new rule will?
- d.