On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:21:11 -0600, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Well, last I checked the information was still excluded
from the article
on that basis, so I'm reassured to find at least one spot where we're on
the same side here. Makes it less likely that one of us has simply gone
loony.
What, you mean Angela freely states that she was born on X date in X
hospital, and we have the record, and they still won't let it in? Or
is it that someone has gone looking based on their own research?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG