On 29/03/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:49:07 +0100, "David
Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>Answering "this blog is not crap" with
"lots of blogs are crap" is
>unconvincing as an argument.
Just as well I didn't, then.
No, though several people have.
It is, however, a primary source. Which secondary
sources have picked
this up?
Ya got a point there. I must note of course that not having an article
on [[Barbara Bauer]] just yet is not a great loss to Wikipedia - being
as it's an encyclopedia, not a newswire. (Perhaps someone could write
it up for Wikinews ...) The example of [[Brian Peppers]] is
instructive - after a year not existing, people realised "oh yeah ...
this is a pretty crappy article on a really not very notable subject."
- d.