On 3/25/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
No, that's why we have BLP. Malicious material may
be reverted and deleted without limit > by any user.
And if it's deleted for that reason and no other admin restores it then fine.
Quoting BLB 3
"Administrators encountering biographies that are unsourced and
controversial in tone, where there is no NPOV version to revert to,
should delete the article without discussion"
I'm assuming that admins are reasonable people, otherwise they
shouldn't be admins. Therefore, if admin Foo, speedy deletes a bio
because he feels that there is no NPOV version to revert to and that
deletion is reverted by admin BAR, then admin BAR reasonably believes
that the bio can be made NPOV.
At this point what would be better, to discuss the deletion "in
process" or have wheel war with the article being deleted and restored
over and over again?