On 3/27/07, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
...
Actually the three examples preceding the blog example would probably not
be
considered reliable sources either, as they are self-published. Obviously,
however, this is ludicrous for, say, people like Jakob Nielsen. If their
books are citable, why shouldn't their self-published works (especially on
the same topics) be citable as well?
Johnleemk
Huh? If the book is published normally, and as a *book* is a fine source,
but then the author turns around and just freely releases the SAME book
online or via a newspaper or Readers Digest or whatever, why would the SAME
material not be a bad source? It's the same material by the same person.
--
- Denny