On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:26:31 +0000, "David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> We are both still of the opinion
> that keeping copies of many hundreds of decisively atrocious edits,
> the majority of which do not rise above the level of childish, is
> probably not worth the server resources committed to it. Plus, the
> insane mountain of crap makes it hard to sot the genuinely creative
> and funny ones, which was the point. I also feel that some editors
> deliberately introduce nonsense in the hope of making BJAODN, but
> that's an aside.
You haven't quantified any actual harm, and your
last sentence is so
far speculation. Got any hard info?
The harm is sixty pages of childish vandalism promoted as a Good
Thing. And yes, the last sentence is speculation, explicitly so.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG