On 3/21/07, Jeff Raymond jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com wrote:
Jossi Fresco wrote:
On Mar 21, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Jeff Raymond wrote:
HOWEVER, if you have a guy who makes 1000 edits a month and spends a good deal of time in policy space and is STILL unaware, what does that do for overall consensus?
Have you checked WP:ATT?
Yeah, I finally found it in February.
What do you think of the work done there? Is it useful, or not? Does it advance the project or not? Does it make it easier for newbies to understand, or not?
I don't think it's an improvement or a step backward. My preferences are to keep them apart, but that's purely cosmetic, and that's no reason to oppose something anyway - when the concepts are broken and out of date, it doesn't matter how you present them if the insides are still the same.
Those are *better* questions than the one you asked.
Yeah, but those questions didn't matter by the time I saw ATT - the process was already said and done.
Not so. We posted to NOR and V that ATT would go live soon *so long as there were no major objections*. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ANo_original_research&a...
That was one day *after* you first posted to the ATT talk page. So you did know about it in plenty of time to object, and anyone with those pages on their watchlist would have seen those notices.
Sarah