On 12/03/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/03/07, Oldak Quill <oldakquill(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 12/03/07, Gary Kirk
<gary.kirk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It's faked though...surely not legal?
It's clearly faked, so would be an "illustration".
Does the Foundation get many requests for logo
use?
Too many.
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Contact_us directs
people to
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Press , which
expressly says "yes you can use the damn logo for press coverage."
Ah, thanks for clearing that one up on both counts.
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)