On 3/7/07, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Actually they don't seem to define what their
counterpart to NPOV is.
For example, is it ok to have an article which states all the horrible
things that communists have done, and none of the horrible things
Americans have done? In any normal, even "conservative" encyclopaedia,
this would still be a glaring omission. If you don't define some kind
of bounds or some central position, the whole thing just becomes
propaganda or worse.
Seriously people, it's called Conservapedia! What do you expect, a
balanced and neutral look at the world? I mean, any time you name
something after a political movement, it's going to be biased. I'm not
going to be that trusting of the
sushi-eating-cappucino-drinking-homosexual-academic-liberal-hollywood-elite-pedia
either, at least not on stuff like religious topics (even though that
particular tomb would describe me as a person fairly well ;).
--Oskar
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l