Steve Bennett wrote:
On 3/6/07, Keith Old keithold@gmail.com wrote:
It probably isn't that surprising that a site set by conservative Christians in the US is keen on AD rather than CE.
Sure, and personally I too prefer AD over CE, though I can understand the rationale there. But to make it a fundamental "commandment" up there with "true and verifiable" and "no opinion" (and of course, "American spelling" :)) surprises me.
I also find something odd in Conservapedia accusing Wikipedia of being "biased", but then taking pride in its own "conservative" stance. Does it implicitly accept that it, too, is "biased"? Or does it imply that a conservative stance is actually a neutral one, and therefore that Wikipedia is biased simply because it does not adopt that same conservative point of view?
It's their site, and it seems at least that these rules are consistent with their philosophy.
I suppose the most irritating thing to them would be for atheist and otherwise corrupt Wikipedians to go there and edit completely within their rules, and let it be clear that these awful people are acting out of true Christian love.
Ec