On 3/1/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
It looks like some kind of semantic game. Capable of
being attributed?
It suggests that we don't need to make an attribution, only assert that
it is possible. Actually attributed statements (or attributions) are
then verifiable.
This has been current practice for a long time. Anyone claiming (as
Jimbo periodically does) that every statement actually has to be
directly or indirectly referenced is not being realistic.
Steve