On 6/27/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail
.com> wrote:
Did you just compare George W. Bush and Essjay? :D
Morality is not a rationale of mine. The point is Essjay is not a
notable
individual to the point that consensus established that there
shouldn't
be
an article on him.
Also it is a beefed up slanderous article on an individual. Since
Essjay
isn't a public figure this (the article) borderlines harassment of an individual. I am not exactly certain of the legal ground on this but Floridan law may have issues with this which puts the foundation at a legal risk. This aspect should also be investigated.
- White Cat
On 6/27/07, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
"beefed up slanderous article"? You're venturing onto very shaky ground right now. You might want to dial back the rhetoric a little.
On 6/27/07, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
Cunctator, I do recall the mess you made over my userpage comment on the Siegenthaler case. Stop doing something like it again.
I don't. Seriously, though, you shouldn't make legal threats.