On 6/27/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail
.com> wrote:
Did you just compare George W. Bush and Essjay? :D
Morality is not a rationale of mine. The point is Essjay is not a
notable
> individual to the point that consensus established that there
shouldn't
be
> an article on him.
>
> Also it is a beefed up slanderous article on an individual. Since
Essjay
> > isn't a public figure this (the article) borderlines harassment of an
> > individual. I am not exactly certain of the legal ground on this but
> > Floridan law may have issues with this which puts the foundation at a
> > legal
> > risk. This aspect should also be investigated.
> >
> > - White Cat
On 6/27/07, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"beefed up slanderous article"? You're venturing onto very shaky ground
right now. You might want to dial back the rhetoric a little.
On 6/27/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Cunctator, I do recall the mess you made over my userpage comment on the
Siegenthaler case. Stop doing something like it again.
I don't. Seriously, though, you shouldn't make legal threats.