On 6/27/07, Rob gamaliel8@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/27/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/27/07, Rob gamaliel8@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure what database you were searching, but your look at the deleted article clearly shows that someone has come up with something "resembling a reliable source". In fact, the deleted article apparently contained at least one bona-fide reliable source. And the Snopes article itself links to other reliable sources.
Do you really think it's appropriate to have an entire article based on a snopes page?
It would depend on the specifics of the situation.
You keep alluding to other reliable sources, but I have yet to come across any. What are they?
eSorn, the sex offender list, the court records, Fox Toledo...