On 6/28/07, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/28/07, C.J. Croy <cjcroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/28/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Freecycle_Network
Have you ever seen a greater quantity of "citation needed",
"neutrality disputed", and other such tags and templates in one
article?
Yes. Your article wins if we judge solely on the controversies section,
but
this article<
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Crazy_8%2527s&direction=p…
wins
if we judge based on tag density in
the overall
article.<
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Crazy_8%2527s&direction=p…
I don't know why people do this. I
suppose it's an improvement over
deleting the info with a vague edit summary such as "Per BLP".
OH MY GAWD. {{dubious}}? {{cn}}?? {{an}}??
Agggggh. Just edit the freaking articles, already. If people want to get
into flamewars, do it on the talk page.
Tags also warn readers--and, frankly, I'm not editing articles owned
by people and getting into flamewars, but I will alert readers that
the article is a piece of crap, and hopefully someone else will come
along and edit the article.
KP