I accept this criterion as necessary. And so the repeated AfDs on the
most important issues with contradictory results are proof of the
system's failure.
On 6/27/07, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The only workable concept of consensus I've ever
discovered is
stability. If hundreds of people edit a piece of work in good faith
over a long period, what changes least over time may be presumed to be
there by consensus. However even the most apparently stable elements
of a work may be deposed quite easily. The result may be a new
consensus or, in other cases, a period of instability where the new
version and the old version compete.
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.