On 6/27/07, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/27/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/06/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
http://wikiabuse.com Usual collection of malcontents there to pretend that blocking spammers is Bad and Evil, but some evidence of sanity as well.
What, in between the stated intent to be a stalkers' site?
How can any site which Willy on Wheels visited and left his precious droppings all over be bad?
To be serious, though... Rootology put in a policy stating that they wouldn't use real names unless the WP users in question use them widely and openly on WP, and from a random sampling of pages over there, they seem to be enthusiastically enforcing that.
Ex: http://wikiabuse.com/index.php?title=JoshuaZ&action=history
(second edit was someone taking his real name out, 2 min after article creation...).
There seems to be far less info on most of us there than on WP.
As annoying as it may feel, having them archive public info about us, and public comments we make or are made about us, doesn't seem to me to rise to the level of stalking. Especially if they are actually following the no-real-names-unless-it's-pointless policy.