Let's face the facts: Gray Jedi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_Jedi, Dark Jedi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Jedi, Dark side devotee http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_side_devotee, Sith http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sith, Jerec http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerec, Aayla Secura http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aayla_Secura, Tremayne (Star Wars) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tremayne_%28Star_Wars%29, Xanatos (Star Wars) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanatos_%28Star_Wars%29, Asajj Ventress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asajj_Ventress, Sev'rance Tann http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sev%27rance_Tann, Yuuzhan Vong http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuuzhan_Vong, *Lightsaber combat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightsaber_combat*, *Force-sensitive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force-sensitive* and *Holocron http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocron*, to name just a few. I love everything Star Wars, but notability and MOS guidelines that embrace this gallopping chaos must be rewritten sooner or later, ideally complementing each other.
Also, I appreciate that "notability" is an often-abused term, but on the other hand, any ambiguity in policies and guidelines is likewise prone to tendentious interpretation. I wouldn't usually argue for stricter guidelines, but here they are necessary.
And I don't quite understand why people are opposed to inter-article merging and intra-article merging (i.e. condensing material), seeing as the current guidelines let everything go unchecked. Guidelines would ideally not be necessary at all, but the current mess in articles about fiction doesn't allow for that luxury.