I think you have missed serious things. Arbcom case seems to have been
rigged by trolls. The evidence presented by excellent editors were not even
looked at. See.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar_2/E…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar_2/E…
What Bakasuprman knows a ton on India comes from certain notorious websites,
a few psuedo/fringe scholars etc. The regular pattern of Hindutva trolls has
been to remove all criticism of people and subjects dear to Bharatiya
Janata Party and its allies (Narendra Modi, or Arun Shorie for example) to
tarnish their critics and politicians of other camps (eg. Rahul Gandhi),
targeting scholars and writers who have efficiently exposed the extreme
rightist views on history and culture and spreading lies against them
(Romila Thapar and Arundati Roy for example).
On 6/22/07, Goolzaur <munaafiq(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Considering that the "sockpuppet" accounts were never blocked, and that
Bakasuprman didn't break 3RR, votestack, or cheat blocks, blnguyen never
brought it up again. I worked with Bakasuprman on Ashfaqulla Khan and
found
that he knows a ton on India. However he seems to be an ultraconservative
user, however smart he is.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Arbcom-member%27s-prolix-script-for-foul-play-tf38933…
Sent from the English Wikipedia mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l