On 6/20/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/20/07, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Primarily I'm thinking about living
biographies. If an article is
substantially a description of events in the life of a living person,
then we should perhaps consider "if in doubt, delete". We already
have a "Living people" category so in most cases it should be easy
enough to identify such articles.
Groovy so delete every article on an election (bound to have a
negative portrayal of someone). I rather doubt that le Pen likes our
article on the last french presidential election.
I think you're reaching here. "United Kingdom general election,
February 1974" is not in category "Living people". It focuses on the
events and only mentions the people as participants.
I think it's still running. Generally those
articles aren't
biographies, however, so I don't really understand the relevance, if
any.
They generally contain biographical details such as say alumni or
stuff about the head.
Such material would be generally unproblematic and any problems that
did crop up could be handled by editing. A bit like the general
election article above.