On 20/06/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:26:05 +0100, "James
Farrar"
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The other change I'd really like to see to the
AfD process is that,
following a "Keep" result, there should be a presumption against
deletion in further AfDs
There already is, in *all* AfDs, not just previously-kept.
Yes, but you cunningly snipped the part of the sentence that contained
my actual point: "with the preferred remedy (if remedy proves
necessary) being restoration to the version of the article that was
[previously] Kept."