On 6/21/07, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Brock Weller wrote:
The first one made us look silly and the second
one made us
encyclopedic? My
earlier post sums this up fairly well.
Changing articles without reading them looks encyclopediac, while changing
articles after reading them is silly?
No offense, but if that's true, we're better off with silly.
Just to point out that tarring all folk with the same brush is not a good
idea, I was one of those who spoke out in favour of removing most spoiler
tags, but never endorsed automated or autopilotmated (is that a word?)
removals. All removals of spoiler tags which I made were done after reading
the article in question; I personally think a "hunt and destroy without
thinking" approach is horrid for anything other than blatant vandalism and
bad faith editing.
Johnleemk