On 6/18/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/18/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
Of course Charlotte knew the
IP addresses were blocked. The question is whether or not Charlotte
knew that it was wrong to edit using them anyway.
This seems like more wikilawyering. She kept running into blocked TOR
proxies, she had seen the Armedblowfish RFA, but she wasn't aware that
it was "wrong" to use them anyway?
Danny used to edit using AOL, and he would quite often run into
blocked IP addresses when doing so. So, no, I don't think running
into blocked IP addresses implies that you yourself are doing anything
wrong. In fact, I think the block message specifically says that your
IP address is blocked and *that doesn't mean that you've done anything
wrong*.
This is not wikilawyering at all. It's common sense.
The RfA of Armedblowfish shows quite clearly that many people, even a
majority of people, support the use of TOR by responsible editors, so
of course there isn't consensus for a policy against that.
The Armedblowfish RFA show that many people supported *Armedblowfish*
using TOR proxies. Nothing more.
I disagree. The support for Armedblowfish editing through TOR was not
anything specific to that individual. Rather, the argument was that
this individual wanted to use TOR, and was making good edits,
therefore it was OK.