On 6/18/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/18/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
In fact, considering that the first 55 votes are all support votes
I misread the RfA, of course. At the time of the vote there were most likely both support and oppose votes.
So there wasn't a consensus against this policy. But there clearly wasn't a consensus in favor of it either.
Actually there is; the consensus is that they are blocked, which is why they are blocked.
Whether or not Charlotte read anything stating that there was a written policy against editing using TOR is a) not at all clear; and b) quite irrelevant anyway, as true Wikipedia policies are based on consensus, not what happens to be written on a policy page.
The whole AFD was specifically because Armedblowfish wanted to become an admin because he was *using TOR proxies and TOR proxies are blocked by policy*. It couldn't be more clear. Please stop wikilawyering.