On 6/18/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/06/07, ElinorD elinordf@gmail.com wrote:
Just a couple of points. I don't think anyone has actually stated as a fact that Charlotte knew that she was violating policy before running for adminship; it has just been suggested as likely. However, James Farrar is demanding evidence that she knew it.
Charlotte was Support Number 56 at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Armedblowfish,
a page which at the time of her vote was devoted to discussion of the whole issue of policy and open proxies. This was at 02:28 on 5 June 2007. She accepted her own admin nomination at 18:52 on 14 June 2007. Is it likely that she supported Armedblowfish without even looking at the previous comments?
Thank you.
Why couldn't Jayjg have said that at the beginning and saved us all a load of hassle?
I sent you an e-mail on this very list a day ago pointing out that CW must have known about the issue, since CW voted in the Armedblowfish RFA. I'm surprised you don't remember that, considering that you responded to the e-mail.