On 6/18/07, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/06/07, ElinorD <elinordf(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Just a couple of points. I don't think anyone
has actually stated as a fact
that Charlotte knew that she was violating policy before running for
adminship; it has just been suggested as likely. However, James Farrar is
demanding evidence that she knew it.
Charlotte was Support Number 56 at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Armedblowfish,
a page which at the time of her vote was devoted to discussion of the whole
issue of policy and open proxies. This was at 02:28 on 5 June 2007. She
accepted her own admin nomination at 18:52 on 14 June 2007. Is it likely
that she supported Armedblowfish without even looking at the previous
comments?
Thank you.
Why couldn't Jayjg have said that at the beginning and saved us all a
load of hassle?
I sent you an e-mail on this very list a day ago pointing out that CW
must have known about the issue, since CW voted in the Armedblowfish
RFA. I'm surprised you don't remember that, considering that you
responded to the e-mail.