On 6/17/07, elisabeth bauer <eflebeth(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
2007/6/17, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 6/17/07, elisabeth bauer
<eflebeth(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
That it
would be already a violation of policy to '''use''' proxies or
anonymizers is a fairly new interpretation of the original descriptive
policy "open proxies may be blocked at any time" and I am not sure
that it is a valid one.
The WP:NOP policy has, since its inception, banned open proxies from
editing Wikipedia, regardless of the specific wording.
Open proxies, yes. But it never tried to extra punish users for the
use of open proxies or anonymizers (apart from the collateral damage
when a vandal using the same IP was blocked).
"Extra punish" in what way?
Until recently it even
tried to help innocent users affected by such a block (i.e.
recommending chinese tor users to ask for a soft block).
That was an essay, not policy.
From giving
up this for practical reasons toward punishing and blocking good users
deliberately for using anonymizers is quite a large step and one that
is not covered by wikimedia wide consensus.
Who has suggested that?