On 6/16/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/16/07, NSLE (Wikipedia)
<nsle.wikipedia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> SlimVirgin, you seem to have missed this question.
>
> Look, it's obvious. Jay did something - rightly or wrongly - and many
people
> are unhappy about how he went about it.
Presumably, if CharlotteWebb
was
> first asked to explain when they first used
an open proxy to edit, as
you
> claim, if no response was given the account
would have been blocked
for
using
open proxies, and the matter sent to ANI, which it wasn't.
I didn't say CW was first asked to explain when s/he first used an
open proxy. I'm assuming she was first asked during the RfA.
The policy allows for the IPs to be blocked, not the accounts that use
them, so the blocking issue is a red herring.
By the way, while we're mentioning things that aren't in the policy,
the policy does not allow for declining of the RFA request of accounts
that use the proxies either.
"Policy doesn't allow" for that? Can you quote the sections of policy you
are thinking of?