On 6/17/07, The Mangoe the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
What strikes me the most, hoever, is how this fits into an incresing effort by current admins to apply litmus tests against candidates.
There have always been "litmus tests" applied to candidates, typically revolving around how many edits they've made, how much vandal reverting they do, etc. There are also some standard questions that are now asked, as another litmus test.
This is politics, especially seeing as how the group doing the testing
is certainly a single party.
Which group is doing what testing where? And where is that party, and do they have good music and cold drinks?