On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/17/07, James Farrar
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Not nearly as simple as the theory that he/she
knew editing from proxies
was
against policy.
Once again: Evidence?
James, you can't keep throwing up convoluted theories without any evidence
whatsoever, and then challenge others for evidence when they present much
simpler ones.
Jay:
Mine is not a convoluted theory; it simply assumes good faith and poor
judgement.
You are proposing a theory that does not, on the face of it, assume
good faith, hence it is imperative that you provide evidence for it.
That you fail to do so weighs against you.
And here are two more questions you still haven't answered: you
apparently knew some time ago that CharlotteWebb was violating NOP.
How long ago did you know, and why did you wait until she was
nominated for Administrator before bringing it up?