On 17/06/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/17/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/06/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
Not nearly as simple as the theory that he/she knew editing from proxies
was
against policy.
Once again: Evidence?
James, you can't keep throwing up convoluted theories without any evidence whatsoever, and then challenge others for evidence when they present much simpler ones.
Jay:
Mine is not a convoluted theory; it simply assumes good faith and poor judgement.
You are proposing a theory that does not, on the face of it, assume good faith, hence it is imperative that you provide evidence for it. That you fail to do so weighs against you.
And here are two more questions you still haven't answered: you apparently knew some time ago that CharlotteWebb was violating NOP. How long ago did you know, and why did you wait until she was nominated for Administrator before bringing it up?