On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/16/07, James Farrar
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > James, why didn't he/she just respond "there's nothing wrong with
that,
is
there?" Occam's razor is often a helpful
tool.
Jay (I'll have to assume that's your first name),
That's the name I use on Wikipedia.
Probably because as soon as you fired the torpedo at her RFA, she went
and looked it up and realised it was against
policy. So she naturally
did the instinctive thing when under attack, which is to shoot back.
That's a pretty far-fetched explanation. Occam's razor, James.
Actually, it's fairly simple. Jay.
Not nearly as simple as the theory that he/she knew editing from proxies was
against policy.