In en-wiki we are making good progress in addressing BLP concerns related to non-notable individuals, as well as being very cautious about using primary sources that have not been described in secondary sources (such as court documents) in BLPs of notable individuals. But what about Wikisource?
Currently there is no exclusionary criteria in Wikisource that will limit contributors into adding material such as civil cases court rulings, including divorce proceedings, bankruptcy cases, and other such disputes.
As it stands know, an editor can upload a bunch of court documents to Wikisource, link these Wikisource pages back to Wikipedia articles and add a links to Wikisource to WP articles via the {{sisterlinks}} or {{wikisource}} templates.
Material that would not have been acceptable to include in a BLP, either as text or as an EL, by virtue of the lack of a consistent exclusionary policy in Wikisource, and relative low number of contributors and admins that monitor material there, is now bypassing all these BLP protection measures we have in place.
Any thoughts?
-- Jossi