On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:45:15 -0700, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
It strikes me that the recurrence of debates about Brandt is more than anything reflective of an obsessive mania to censor anything about the man.
It strikes me that when censorship is invoked it is very often an indication of lack of a more rational basis for the argument.
Have you read the comments of others about this? This is a "biography" teased from numerous sources which are fundamentally about something else. Even if you have no problem with that, others may, and that does not indicate censorship, it indicates a credible concern with the abuse of article space to further an agenda (in this case attacking Brandt, or maybe just having an article because he doesn't want one).
To dismiss valid concerns held by apparently significant numbers of people as "censorship" is at best a gross oversimplification.
Guy (JzG)