On 6/14/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
I'm hopeful. Once we've seen the back of
that article, I'll begin to
consider that Wikipedia has come of age.
Seems more like giving up on the Wikipedia process entirely. What else
will we decide we "can't be trusted" to write articles about next? And
will that decision be made in the same haphazard back-channel way this
one is being made in?
It was an open discussion followed by almost certainly the most
comprehensively documented close we have ever seen. You can see the
comments the closer made as he considered each point. The result is
on deletion review but seems to be holding up very well indeed.