On 11/06/07, Neil Harris usenet@tonal.clara.co.uk wrote:
We have a choice:
a) Drop the GFDL and pick a better license (ABL). ...
b) Live with it.
or:
c) since all existing articles are licensed under "Version 1.2 [of the GFDL] or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation", lobby the FSF to make the next version of the GFDL _be_ that better licence.
This is true, but requires a) a long-term incremental approach and b) the FSF not going mad :-)