--- Mathias Schindler <mathias.schindler(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/11/07, jf_wikipedia <jf_wikipedia(a)mac.com>
wrote:
Wikipedia, together with
BBC.com, ebay, Last.fm
and
LiveJournal.com
was rated as "generally privacy aware"
by Privacy
International, the
...
Goggle was at
the bottom, with a rating of
"comprehensive consumer
surveillance and entrenched hostility to
privacy"
http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/internet/interimrankings.pdf
I asked them for further information. So far, I am
unconvinced about their methodology.
And you deserve a true Wikipedian stamp for asking, even if
you work for Google, own stock in Google, or work for an
organization that is paid by Google, in which case you
really should mention that now and hand off your data
collection efforts to someone that's not a shill. Ideally,
someone that's not hostile to Google either.
SourceWatch:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Privacy_International
Wikipedia's article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_International
ACLU's description (listed along with EFF as a privacy
site):
http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/15680res20010823.html
EFF lists PI as another resource in it's Privacy Top 12 (it
also includes a Google search link, but no link to
Wikipedia):
http://www.eff.org/Privacy/eff_privacy_top_12.php
Google's own ACLU site only results for PI:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=10&btnG=Google+Sea…
Google's own EFF site only results for PI:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=10&btnG=Google+Sea…
~~Pro-Lick
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo!
Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433