On 6/11/07, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/11/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
So to not be speediable, you have to assert that the subject might have
received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent
of
the subject?
Such a humorous CSD criterion.
Well now I know you're not a wikilawyer Anthony, since a wikilawyer
would have realised that the existence of independent reliable sources
merely raises a presumption of notability, it does not establish it,
and this state of affairs is compatible with the word "might".
Huh?
First of all, I will admit that I thought until this point that the
existence of multiple independent reliable sources established notability.
I find it strange and confusing that you say it merely raises a presumption
of notability. But that's yet another topic, except as it applies to CSD
A7.
As it applies to CSD A7, well, I don't know. I'm going back to my first
answer: Huh?