On 6/11/07, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/11/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
So to not be speediable, you have to assert that the subject might have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent
of
the subject?
Such a humorous CSD criterion.
Well now I know you're not a wikilawyer Anthony, since a wikilawyer would have realised that the existence of independent reliable sources merely raises a presumption of notability, it does not establish it, and this state of affairs is compatible with the word "might".
Huh?
First of all, I will admit that I thought until this point that the existence of multiple independent reliable sources established notability. I find it strange and confusing that you say it merely raises a presumption of notability. But that's yet another topic, except as it applies to CSD A7.
As it applies to CSD A7, well, I don't know. I'm going back to my first answer: Huh?