On 6/10/07, David Mestel <david.mestel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Except that since there seem to be more articles
requiring improvement than
there are people willing or able to devote time to improving them, the
question is not "would we want the article if it were improved?", but "do
we
think that the article in its current state is beneficial to the quality of
the encyclopedia?".
Except in the most extreme cases, deletion should be considered only
after other measures have failed.
—C.W.