That requires a pretty twisted definition of "the
Document", though,
consisting of multiple dynamically generated pages
But presumably when I edit someone else's version of a page, I/Wikipedia
am/is distributing a modified copy of the Document, so there needs to be a
History section as part of it under section 4.I.
Trying to apply the GFDL to Wikipedia is humorous
sometimes...
Indeed...
David
On 10/06/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Deleting BJAODN is a complete waste of time, since it lead to this
completely useless and unproductive chain of discussions. IMHO, Wikipedia
culture is better stored in meta.
- White Cat
On 6/10/07, Gabe Johnson <gjzilla(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/10/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't you guys have ANYTHING better to do than waste time on the
BJAODN?
-
White Cat
Well it *is* an integral part of Wikipedia culture, and it *is* a
volunteer project, so... no. ~~~~
--
Absolute Power
C^7rr8p£5 ab£$^u7£%y
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David