That requires a pretty twisted definition of "the Document", though, consisting of multiple dynamically generated pages
But presumably when I edit someone else's version of a page, I/Wikipedia am/is distributing a modified copy of the Document, so there needs to be a History section as part of it under section 4.I.
Trying to apply the GFDL to Wikipedia is humorous sometimes...
Indeed...
David
On 10/06/07, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
Deleting BJAODN is a complete waste of time, since it lead to this completely useless and unproductive chain of discussions. IMHO, Wikipedia culture is better stored in meta.
- White CatOn 6/10/07, Gabe Johnson gjzilla@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/10/07, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
Don't you guys have ANYTHING better to do than waste time on the
BJAODN?
- White CatWell it *is* an integral part of Wikipedia culture, and it *is* a volunteer project, so... no. ~~~~
-- Absolute Power C^7rr8p£5 ab£$^u7£%y
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l