"4.B. List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or entities responsible for authorship of the modifications in the Modified Version, together with at least five of the principal authors of the Document (all of its principal authors, if it has fewer than five), unless they release you from this requirement."
Doesn't any editing say we accept the GNU lisense and that anything we write will be deleted or edited. That would clearly class as a release."
On 10/06/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/10/07, michael west michawest@gmail.com wrote:
GNU lisense simply states that we should credit Wikipedia.
Which part of the GFDL do you claim says this?
It would be impossible to quote every single editor. The History tab is surely there as a tool against vandalism ON EXISTING articles. As most editors are anonymous, it is just foolish to suggest that every editor be credited. Nobody is saying that the article existed somewhere else or that many editors contributed to it. They use those article in the sense that "this was on wikipedia" but no longer. The GNU lisense covers that.
GFDL requires that you credit the authors. If the author choses to be credited as geni that is their choice.
-- geni
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l