I messed some parts of my post.
I meant rabid Hindutvavadi bastards *who were active on a bulletin board of
hate campaign called hinduunity.org* (banned in India, I suppose.) Somebody
provided evidence of Hindu editors' activity on that board. Blnguyen
conveniently overlooked every piece of evidence against the army of trolls
under user nearly headless nick.
What provoked that "vaguely comprehensibly English" comment? The log entries
that lost format and appearing as disordered links?
On 6/9/07, cu clt <abcclt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am one of this bunch.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Ku…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Kuntan
Forgot myself exactly which one. Many of them are not mine.
I viewed Rama's Arrow with contempt until he chose to block those rabid
Hindutvavadi bastards, who were active participants of for which he is in
the soup now.
Blnguyen's extreme partiality towards an Indian extreme rightist
nationalist party's views should raise some questions. Do you mete out 72
hours block for abusive sockpuppetry, 10 or 30 minutes for repeated
incivility etc?
On 6/9/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com > wrote:
>
> It'd be nice if you identified which on-Wiki user you are - I didn't see
> that.
>
>
--
____|
______________
______________|___________
_____________________________
___________13_______________________|