I messed some parts of my post. I meant rabid Hindutvavadi bastards *who were active on a bulletin board of hate campaign called hinduunity.org* (banned in India, I suppose.) Somebody provided evidence of Hindu editors' activity on that board. Blnguyen conveniently overlooked every piece of evidence against the army of trolls under user nearly headless nick. What provoked that "vaguely comprehensibly English" comment? The log entries that lost format and appearing as disordered links?
On 6/9/07, cu clt abcclt@gmail.com wrote:
I am one of this bunch.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Kun... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Kuntan Forgot myself exactly which one. Many of them are not mine. I viewed Rama's Arrow with contempt until he chose to block those rabid Hindutvavadi bastards, who were active participants of for which he is in the soup now. Blnguyen's extreme partiality towards an Indian extreme rightist nationalist party's views should raise some questions. Do you mete out 72 hours block for abusive sockpuppetry, 10 or 30 minutes for repeated incivility etc?
On 6/9/07, Matthew Brown <morven@gmail.com > wrote:
It'd be nice if you identified which on-Wiki user you are - I didn't see that.