On 6/7/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/07, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
There's a lot to be said for that, but some of us don't get the choice. From the moment in January, 2005, when I thought "wouldn't it be a good idea if people reading this article could actually see a guy sucking his own cock, just the same as we've decided that a person visiting the clitoris article will see a clitoris", and boldly acted upon that thought, it was evident to me that even if I tried to run from policy, it was going to happen to me anyway.
Ironically you now oppose that principle when applied to Lolicon.
I always have and, most probably, I always shall. In fact I raised the unsuitability of the lolicon pictures when discussing the autofellatio picture, and questioned what I considered to be their inappropriate focus on a relatively unexceptional act, while (at the time) we had an article displaying a cartoon picture of an infant naked except for panties clutching a teddy bear equipped with a gigantic dildo. We've advanced from there, fortunately, so now we have a a discussion over whether the sexually titillating representative of prepubescent sexual victimhood is to be a free image with her legs akimbo or a non-free one with a phallic object stuck in her mouth.