Right. We should remember this only applies to modifited versions of the Document. If Wikipedia wanted to make the claim that it's not transferring between separately licensed individual documents when text goes from one page to the next, I have trouble seeing how that can be argued with.
Then again it's preferable for a host of reasons to act as if each page is a separate Document and we make sure to comply as much as possible with the conditions covering Modified Versions.
On 6/7/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/7/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/07, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
I would love it if those who profess to care about pure GFDL compliance would do something about restoring the lost edit histories in the 2001-2002 period of a large number of entries.
Eh they should all have picked up 5 more principle authors by now.
The GFDL requires you to credit *all* authors, not just 5. 5 have to be on the title page (where Wikipedia currently has none). They all have to be in the section entitled History.
There are lots of places where Wikipedia is *materially* non-compliant with the GFDL. Crediting of users who have made no attempt to identify themselves is not, IMHO, one of them. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l