On 6/7/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/07, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/7/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
No it does not.
Asserting something doesn't make it so. What is so different about templates that we should not be encouraging people to go ahead and correct problems when they see them, and instead discouraging from editing the templates at all?
Fallacy of the excluded middle
Be bold has always been about articles right back to the first edits in the recorded history. In the case of templates the cost of getting things wrong can be rather higher (The job queue length is currently 366,759). Remeber just because you think you have spoted a mistake doesn't mean there is one.
You are incorrect. Being bold has been about policy as well.