On 6/6/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
Right, but you're missing my point. NOR and RS aren't rules that we follow to protect people's privacy, but they do have that positive side-effect.
That is not their objective.
That's a pretty long list in itself.
It's padded though.
for non fiction we can rely on the "you can't copyright facts" to get around "Stuff that violates someone's IP"
born secret may not be constitutional
the next two would run into NOR
I think U.S. law combined with the NOR and reliable source rules adequetely eliminate the vast majority of the undesirable information that might otherwise be in Wikipedia. But I'm much more on the open access side than most people.
There are a few other bits and pieces (copyright although I'm not sure that is going to work in the case of the Diana crash pics) but yes.